I recently asked What is the right reading level for a blog?

The guru of new media writing, Seth Godin, understands that, like it or not, we’re involved in selling. Money may never change hands, but we’re writing to be read and have to get onto the reader’s wavelength.

Godin refers to an interesting piece Literary style by the numbers by Steven Berlin Johnson.

Johson used amazon’s ‘text stats’ to compare the ratio of “Average Words Per Sentence” and “% Complex Words” for a few authors. Malcolm Gladwell – a true master to transmitting ideas popularly – averages 17 words per sentence in ‘Blink’. Compare this with, say, Foucault’s 38 and Fredric Jameson’s 53!

Their use of complex words is: Gladwell 12%, Foucault 19%, and Jameson 22%.

OK, so we can extrapolate from this that new media writing should probably have shorter sentences and fewer complex words. Great. But here’s something else to factor in:

What I thought was so striking was that…each author’s books are closer to his other books than they are to the other two author’s books. In other words, each of us has a certain sweet spot of complexity that we come back to book after book.

At copyblogger.com Brian Lash (who pointed me to the Godin and Johnson pieces) tells us Why writing like a college student will kll you online. He emphasises the informality of new media writing compared to what counted for good writing in college.

He has five strategies to help us keep it simple, stupid.

Read for 5 minutes before you write. Not just anything – read something “simple, unasuming and effective” (like Seth Godin)
Start with a single line
And then swop it for one that’s less formal, “then let its style cascade through the rest of your work.”
Speak it
“New media writing should sound like your everyday speech, albeit a more precise, polished version.”
Apply the “impress test”
“When you find yourself impressed…simplify your message without compromising its meaning.”
Find someone who will keep you honest

Reader, how’m I doing?

5 thoughts on “K.I.S.S

  1. I think you are doing pretty good.

    Perhaps a little more explanation of jargon at times. I know the jargon but most others on line may not (eg. who are Foucault and Jameson?)

    But this leads to a different spin on niche. If we are really writing for a niche should we be writing for the general reader?

    My preference is for everything to be put simply and clearly.

    And getting on to the readers wavelength includes stuff like good examples and writing from your heart (something I’m currently trying to work my way through).

    My answer to your question in brief: pretty good.

  2. evan – Thanks, Evan, I’ll take that on board. It’s a good question – should lesser known things be explicated (at the risk of boring/patronising the reader who knows) or not (at the risk of alienting the reader not in the know). Or, try to omit that stuff completely!

  3. i’d be very sad if you followed the market’s suggestions for making your blog more marketable. have you thought about who you want your audience to be, yet? that seems to me the first thing a blogger should do…

  4. ama – I don’t think I could sustain writing ‘for the market’. However, I do believe that writing on the net demands different writing, and this requires skill, practice, etc.
    As far as the audience is concerned – maybe I’m wrong about this but trying to think about what others will find interesting feels inhibiting to me. I prefer to just go for it, but try to keep an imaginary reader in mind to help me write better – still got plenty to learn there!
    A thought-provoking comment, ta.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s